• StellarTabi [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The labor theory of value is the core Marxist economic principle, and it is incorrect.

    This is probably a really dumb rhetoric (I’ve seen it a lot), but I’d to see a good explanation of how dumb it is. Is it like “Newtonian physics doesn’t explain black holes, therefore gravity DNE” or is it something else?

    • StellarTabi [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To take a step back, the user claims Marx was wrong about some details, but I’m presuming they’re not saying it for no reason, the unstated and implied conclusion is probably something like “therefore, we shouldn’t try socialism”.

      At least I’m trying to follow the logic of if Marx was wrong about X, Y, Z, then [conclusion], but there’s only the claim that he was wrong about some random things as if anyone gives a shit if Marx was wrong about some obscure economics detail 100 years ago.

      • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The empirical grounding for the labor theory of value has been conclusively proven since at least 1998 thanks to statistical work from Anwar Shaikh and Eduardo M. Ochoa using US input output data

        To be honest you don’t even have to go that far, these libs literally don’t know the difference between use value and exchange value, or embodied labor and concrete labor