In 1968 and 1969, student protests at several Japanese universities ultimately forced the closure of campuses across Japan. Known as daigaku funsō (大学紛争, lit. ‘university troubles’) or daigaku tōsō (大学闘争, ‘university struggles’), the protests were part of the worldwide protest cycle in 1968 and the late-1960s Japanese protest cycle, including the Anpo protests of 1970 and the struggle against the construction of Narita Airport. Students demonstrated initially against practical issues in universities and eventually formed the Zenkyōtō in mid-1968 to organize themselves. The Act on Temporary Measures concerning University Management allowed for the dispersal of protesters in 1969.

Initially, demonstrations were organized to protest against unpaid internships at the University of Tokyo Medical School. Building on years of student organization and protest, New Left student organizations began occupying buildings around campus. The other main campus where the protests originated was Nihon University. They began with student discontent over alleged corruption in the university board of directors. At Nihon, protests were driven less by ideology and more by pragmatism because of the university’s traditional and conservative nature. The movement spread to other Japanese universities, escalating into violence both on campus and in the streets. In late 1968, at the zenith of the movement, thousands of students entered Tokyo’s busiest railway station, Shinjuku, and rioted. Factional infighting (uchi-geba, 内ゲバ) was rampant among these students. In January 1969, the police besieged the University of Tokyo and ended the protests there, leading to renewed fervor from students at other universities, where protests continued. However, as public support for the students fell, and the police increased their efforts to stop the protests, the movement waned. The passage of the 1969 Act on Temporary Measures concerning University Management gave police the legal basis to apply more forceful measures, although splinter groups of the New Left groups, such as the United Red Army, continued their violence into the 1970s.

The students drew ideological inspiration from the works of Marxist theorists like Karl Marx and Leon Trotsky, French existentialist philosophers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus, and the homegrown philosophy of the Japanese poet and critic Takaaki Yoshimoto. Yoshimoto’s interpretation of “autonomy” (jiritsusei) and “subjectivity” (shutaisei) were based on his critique of the progressive liberal interpretations of these ideas by other Japanese intellectuals such as Masao Maruyama, whom he denounced as hypocritical. The students’ devotion to shutaisei in particular would lead ultimately to the disintegration of their movement, as they focused increasingly on “self-negation” (jiko hitei) and “self-criticism” (hansei).

The university troubles helped in the emergence of Mitsu Tanaka’s Women’s Liberation (Ūman Ribu) movement. While most disputes had settled down by the 1970s and many of the students had reintegrated into Japanese society, the protests’ ideas entered the cultural sphere, inspiring writers like Haruki Murakami and Ryū Murakami. The students’ political demands made education reform a priority for the Japanese government, which it tried to address through organizations such as the Central Council for Education. The protests have been the subject of modern popular media, such as Kōji Wakamatsu’s 2007 film United Red Army.

Zenkyōtō

The All-Campus Joint Struggle Committees (Japanese: 全学共闘会議; Zengaku kyōtō kaigi), commonly known as the Zenkyōtō (Japanese: 全共闘), were Japanese student organizations consisting of anti-government leftists and non-sectarian radicals.

The movement began at the University of Tokyo and Nihon University, and expanded rapidly to the other major universities over the subsequent three years.

Across the country, 127 universities — 24 percent of the national four-year university system in total — experienced strikes or occupations in 1968. In 1969, this rose to 153 universities or 41 percent. There was also a Zenkyōtō movement in the Japanese high schools.

Up to this point, mobilizing in the student movement meant conforming to the rules of the student council and constituting a clear majority within it. The Zenkyōtō, however, was formed in a voluntarist manner — or through direct democracy, so to speak — as an extralegal organization that operated outside the rules and without recognition by the university administration, consciously opposing the existing type of conformism.

The Zenkyōtō had no rules that governed either its membership or its leadership. Political sects participated in the movement, along with a multitude of small nonpartisan groups, but these organizations fought under the banner of each specific university in the Zenkyōtō.

From the moment of its formation, the Zenkyōtō spread to universities across the whole of Japan, something that had never been seen before in the postwar Japanese student movement, marking the specific character of ’68. Yet, at the same time, the Zenkyōtō as an organization overburdened itself from the outset with political difficulties specific to the practice of direct democracy, difficulties that would emerge later as the movement developed.

Hexbear links

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • Piment [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    It seems like the makeshift new 196 from blahaj called c/onehundredninetysix has completely won out from the original one that migrated to lemmy.world; there are 10x as many posts on the new blahaj one than the migrated one. Hopefully the behaviour associated with the problematic mod that was behind the migration has migrated with that mod. But cool to see users not being okay with going to an objectively worse instance.

  • makotech222 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Hi All, we just pushed a minor update to hexbear:

    • Killed next.hexbear.com. The maintainer has ended development, and we were also noticing the app taking up significant CPU time for no apparent reason (possibly causing the general slowness of the site recently)
    • New setting in user settings “Blur Images” to toggle the hexbear-specific image blur that we use. It is stored in your browser localStorage, so it won’t be saved with your account.
    • Minor edge case fix for missing pronouns, thanks @Edie@hexbear.net
  • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    linkedin is so useless for looking for a job. It wasn’t bad enough it’s mostly ghost postings, I now have to sift through like 20 pages of SEOd spam from a tutoring company that pays barely above minimum wage.

  • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    a person that makes tweets or uhhh xeets? is called a Tweeter? kinda a gross word. Twit? kinda funny. Twitt-i/er probably confuse people since it’d be the same as the platform.

    X being just a letter you’re more or less free to stick whatever on it–X-ite, X-ian, X-er, X-ling… unfortunately for Musk literally every variant is childish as hell lmao

  • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Tried Death Must Die a while back. The problem with making a game that’s “Vampire Survivors mixed with Hades” is that your game is gonna be compared to Hades. A game which has no weaknesses and is at least an 8/10 in every category possible. Amazing gameplay, music, visual design, writing, progression, replayability, anything you can think of, Hades is great at it. So when your Hades-inspired game does have weaknesses, they suddenly become very glaring in comparison.

    And the biggest weakness Death Must Die has imo is the writing and the characters. It’s basically non-existant what does exist is pretty bad. Now sure, Vampire Survivors has hardly any writing or story either, but Death Must Die clearly takes inspiration from Hades in that regard, not only are your powers given to you by gods, they also have a voice line every time you get one of their powers. Except where the Hades gods have entire books of dialogue where they talk about themselves, the player character, their many relationships with other characters etc., Death Must Die has none of that. The 3rd time I encountered the fire goddess, her dialogue was already reduced to “Let’s light it up!” or “Coming in hot!”-type of one-liners.

    Given how the playable characters are written in a completely different way with no voice acting and different typing gimmicks (like how one uses xd and >.> in her dialogue), it feels like the gods and their voice lines are literally just there because that’s how Hades does it. Except it sucks here and makes the game actively worse. Vampire Survivors gets by with no characters and no dialogue, which is way preferable to bad characters and bad dialogue.

    Edit: Just because this sounds so negative I wanna say that Death Must Die is not a bad game at all, in terms of gameplay it does the Vampire Survivors x Hades thing really well. The graphics are completely fine for an indie game made by a small team. I think the main characters each having their gimmick in how they speak is kinda neat. It’s just the terrible writing that makes it come off like a cheap knockoff when it isn’t.