We Just Got More Evidence That Long COVID Is a Brain Injury

The exact nature of long COVID is still coming to light, but we just got some of the best evidence yet that this debilitating condition stems from a brain injury.

Using high-resolution scanners, researchers at the Universities of Cambridge and Oxford have shown microscopic, structural abnormalities in the brainstems of those recovering from COVID-19.

Signs of brain inflammation were present up to 18 months after first contracting the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

“We show that the brainstem is a site of vulnerability to long-term effects of COVID-19, with persistent changes evident in the months after hospitalization,” the authors of the study conclude.

https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae215

#health #science #biology #news @science@lemmy.world @science@beehaw.org @news@lemmy.world @health@lemmy.world @usnews@beehaw.org

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      There are many in this thread. I replied to one.

      People who casually dismiss conspiracy theories are exactly as bad as those who unquestioningly believe them.

      • grepe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        People who casually dismiss conspiracy theories are exactly as bad as those who unquestioningly believe them.

        the occams razor is a crucial part of scientific thinking for a reason.

        the space of all possibilities is infinite. the space of what people believe and say is enormous. the space of what is actually truth is comparatively smaller, unrelated and uncaring about either of those.

        you can’t possibly consider everything everyone says - especially if what they are saying keeps changing as they see fit. you’ll just burn out if you try and end up in endless “discussions” with the people who are “just asking questions”…

        that doesn’t mean i should dismiss or ridicule people, but it does mean i will not spend a single heartbeat thinking about another “proof” that the earth is flat or controlled by lizard prople or something.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          occams razor is a crucial part of scientific thinking for a reason

          Holy shitballs. NO. Occam’s razor may lead you to a solution faster, but the scientific approach is to exhaust all possibilities. Occam’s razor implies the sun goes round the earth. It is not scientific.

          you can’t possibly consider everything everyone says

          Of course you can. You may assign it a credibility of almost 0, but you can still consider a theory. In science this process is decentralized and heavily delegated.

          if what they are saying keeps changing as they see fit.

          Then they become even less credible.

          i will not spend a single heartbeat thinking about another “proof” that the earth is flat.

          Well, at least you were open enough to consider one argument.

          Honestly, I was on board with the lizard people right up to the point David Ike insisted that it wasn’t a metaphor.

      • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Did you see someone whose social life is built around dismissing conspiracy believers or did you just reply to someone who rejects conspiracy thinking? I suspect it’s the latter.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Did you see someone whose social life is built around dismissing conspiracy believers

          Did I say there was someone whose social life is built around dismissing conspiracy believers? No.

          I’m point out that people who automatically reject conspiracy thinking have exactly the same mentality and online support groups as those who blindly believe them. I illustrated this by mirroring their exact words.

          • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Go back to the furst comment of yours that I replied to. You claim there’s a community of anti-conspiracy people and what Im suggesting is that the conspiracy thinkers are a ral community. If you buy into flat earth there are conventions to go to, merch to buy and shows to listen/watch that are all part of the flat earth community.

            Skeptics don’t have that in the same way. My unwillingness to accept Bigfoot isn’t because im searching to belong but the Bigfoot hunter might be.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              You claim there’s a community of anti-conspiracy people

              Yep. On reddit there was a organized group called themselves top minds of reddit r/tmor

              conspiracy thinkers are a real community.

              Only in that people post in the same subreddit.

              If you buy into flat earth there are conventions to go to, merch to buy and shows to listen/watch that are all part of the flat earth community.

              Agreed. But doing that you aren’t automatically a member of the sasquatch search community nor do you automatically believe that Hitler survived and moved to South America.

              Conspiracies are separate (generally).

              Skeptics don’t have that in the same way.

              The people who don’t take official explanations as gospel are the Skeptics. One should not dismiss flat earthers until a ship has been observed disappearing over the horizon.

              If you automatically dismiss something because someone calls it a debunked conspiracy then you are not a skeptic.

              My unwillingness to accept Bigfoot isn’t because im searching to belong but the Bigfoot hunter might be.

              My unwillingness to believe the tech companies privacy statement doesn’t push me to join a community

              • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                57 minutes ago

                Again conspiracy theorists have IRL events and a culture whereas “Best Minds of Reddit” is a subreddit and not a community. They aren’t the same thing. People identify as flat earthers, JFK conspiracists et al whereas no one identifies as an anti-conspiracy theorist

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 minutes ago

                  People interested in a common topic may meet IRL, but that’s a specific community. Topics don’t overlap. There is no all encompassing conspiracy theorist community. The closest example I can find is Conspiracy Con which has not run for more than a decade.

                  Anyone who automatically dismisses a topic because some calls it a conspiracy theory is anti-conspiracy theorist.

                  is a subreddit and not a community

                  My point is that r/tmor is just as equal a community as r/conspiracy