• humble peat digger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Building houses without concrete and bricks and then located in the woods - what can go wrong.

    What I don’t understand- most countries have fire fighting airplanes for these things.
    How in a world US being a country with such a mighty economy - doesn’t have them or doesn’t want to use them. Pathetic

    • Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      I don’t think you have any concept of the size of the burning area or the intense weather conditions in the western US. Months of drought conditions then 90mph wind gusts. Once a blaze is going it will jump all over the place due to the wind, making it virtually impossible to contain until the winds start to subside. Cleaning out underbrush can help, but with winds that high fires will jump directly from tree to tree. Some of these fires only took one spark to start. And the conditions will only grow more intense as climate change continues. This is not a problem that’s easy to solve.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      California didn’t used to burn like this. Yeah, there were fires, but they were far more rare and didn’t affect as many people because the state wasn’t as populous and nowhere near as short of water.

      As to your second statement, it’s bullshit. Wth the “mighty economy” statement has to do with anything. There’s a huge firefighting industry on the west coast and in California, both ground and air. They are using aircraft, even with a temporary stop due to high winds.