Some people say it naturally looks uncanny for them, but it doesn’t happen to me, I can’t really spot them… One trick to try is counting the fingers, but what else can I do?

  • x87_floatingpoint [he/him, it/its]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    elements that are repeated a lot in the background in places that aren’t attached.

    Would the background “forest” in this “AI”-generated image be an example of this? The one that I circled in green. It looks oddly repetitive, I don’t think natural forests are this regular…

    • TheSpectreOfGay [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Ah my advice was mostly for digital drawing stuff as that’s what I look at most often, oops

      I think in this I’m drawn to the buildings and snow. they kind of look like they’re bleeding into each other and aren’t as rigid as they should be. but yea, the trees definetly look off. to get that sorta blur you’d have to blur the background or have a camera’s focal length set to… whatever i don’t know shit about cameras. that happens in photography of landscapes a lot, but doesn’t make sense to be right next to something that isn’t blurred at all.

      • x87_floatingpoint [he/him, it/its]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Advice for digital drawings is good, too (I sometimes look at digital drawings and share the ones that I liked, wouldn’t want to be accidentally promoting “AI” stuff because I didn’t notice), I just kinda picked the first picture that I had at hand for practice