Link to post by reddit user Appropriate-Cycle-48.


I am a trial attorney. I came to this subreddit, like many of you, after the veracity of the videos published in 2017 by the New York Times was confirmed in 2020. From the very beginning, two key figures, Lue Elizondo and Christopher Mellon, have earned my trust due to their consistency and attitudes. And I have the feeling that they are some of the main architects of the effort aimed at achieving disclosure. I’ve also always had the feeling that Obama is behind this, somehow, behind the scenes.

Following recent events, it seems to me that we may be able to discern a pattern in this process. We all ask for evidence. More evidence than we’ve already seen. See with our own eyes ships, bodies, and any information about dealings with that non-human intelligence that is around us, but out of our reach. I’m sure Elizondo and Mellon would love to give us that evidence. Provoke in us a collective astonishment that would put an end to so many years of deceit and lies. They have seen it. But they can’t show us anything because all the evidence is inside safes guarded by military personnel in the service of generals like the one Representative Burchett mentioned yesterday. Generals, Admirals, and arrogant people who consider us incapable of assimilating the truth and who think that we are simple idiots who do not deserve to know the reality of the Universe in which we live.

How can we overcome that obstacle? Well, with the inverse evidence process. On the 26th Grusch will confirm under oath in Congress what he has already told us (which is amazing). The debunkers, whether they’re on pay or not, will immediately start telling us that we’re still out of evidence. That everything is “hearsay” and little else. But I beg you to pay attention to one detail: If a high-ranking US intelligence official were to testify in Congress under oath to a lie (for example, that the Pentagon poisons children’s food in daycare centers), he would immediately be arrested and charged with serious crimes. However, Grusch is going to tell us on the 26th, practically, a story that will turn many series and films of the science fiction and espionage genre almost into documentary series on our recent history. And no one is going to stop him. The Pentagon is not going to press charges against him for lying. Because? Because then they would be the ones committing a crime for falsely accusing someone of lying, when he is telling the truth. This is the inverse evidence. And IT IS evidence. I know that it is not what we are all waiting for (the definitive defeat of those arrogant people who are enslaving us behind their wall of false “national security”). But it is one more step, and I am very grateful to people like Grusch, Mellon, Elizondo and Burchett for it. Keep strong guys.

  • Flashoflight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah the pentagon plays by different rules.

    I think this lawyer is saying that you don’t always need evidence to win a case. These are expert witnesses and people go to jail for far less credible witnesses saying they committed a crime.

    Im definitely looking at this case differently because I saw a UAP when I was a kid and it changed my life. I try to put myself in others who haven’t had first count experiences though and it’s rational to demand evidence.

    • SignullGone@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you’re right in regards to this post.

      I haven’t personally seen anything, but I try to keep an open mind. I try not to rush to judgement one way or the other and simply let the chips fall where they may.

      I know there are a lot of passionate people, both believers and skeptics. I want to help facilitate discussion and hopefully find some answers along the way.