• IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      65% trailing the EU by 4%. Your metric is absurd 🤣 comparing a school test to home ownership historically. What an insane argument. Tell me you’ve never taken a statistics class with out saying the word 🤣.

      • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If you think 35% of people not being able to afford a home in a world of plenty is ok, then I think you have more to learn about than statistics

        • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Point out where I said it is okay?

          Maybe you shouldn’t be looking for an argument. 65% is the status quo. And it’s not like most of the renters are living homeless. Hence the doomerism.

          • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            You laughed in my face and called my viewpoint absurd while defending the status quo

            If you think the status quo is acceptable then I’m not going to be the person to convince you otherwise

            • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I said your metric was worthless. Comparing housing rates with an arbitrary testing scale is at best a lack of understanding math. I also never defended the status quo, only that the doomer mentality is not needed or warranted.