ouch@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoVPS encryptionmessage-squaremessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up152arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up151arrow-down1message-squareVPS encryptionouch@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square31fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNegativeLookBehind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoDo VPSs typical give you LOM? Honest question. Maybe LUKs isn’t good if you can’t console in.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYeah, at least the ones I used have some kind of console/terminal you can use and often you can access BIOS and reinstall the OS if you want.
minus-squareZikeji@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoLUKS, or anything that relies on the server encrypting, is highly vulnerable (see schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business’s response). Your best bet would be encrypting client side before it arrives on the server using a solution like rclone, restic, borg, etc.
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYes. No proof their LUKS prompt isnt tampered with
Do VPSs typical give you LOM? Honest question. Maybe LUKs isn’t good if you can’t console in.
Yeah, at least the ones I used have some kind of console/terminal you can use and often you can access BIOS and reinstall the OS if you want.
LUKS, or anything that relies on the server encrypting, is highly vulnerable (see schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business’s response).
Your best bet would be encrypting client side before it arrives on the server using a solution like rclone, restic, borg, etc.
Yes. No proof their LUKS prompt isnt tampered with