good idea/bad idea, necessary democratic reform or authoritarian imposition? are there better or worse ways to do it?

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)
      3·
      2 months ago

      Some people in Australia absolutely have ideas like you describe, fortuitously the rest of us don’t have to vote for them.

        • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
          5·
          2 months ago

          Anti-smoking legislation is evidence of an authoritarian society. Lifestyle control and coercive paternalism appease the whims of fanatics who hold positions of influence. In a free economy, demand dictates supply. Smoking bans and restrictions are only in place because there is currently not enough demand for smoke-free establishments to appease those who claim they speak for all society. The will of a few is being forced on the many.

          wanting to exist in a society where you don’t get second-hand lung cancer is not fascism, oh my god. it is perfectly socially acceptable and not even the slightest bit “authoritarian” to regulate actions that can directly harm other people. and this is an absolutely comical free-market-absolutist-brained idea of what freedom is.