• fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t disagree with you, having walkable infrastructure would be great.

    It just doesn’t really seem achievable in any meaningful way.

    A few hundred km from here a gargantuan hydrogen facility is being built - using solar to cracking hydrogen from sea water. It will take decades to build, and is a big undertaking.

    I offer the above as an example of something difficult but reasonably achievable.

    Lobbying local government to favour walkable infrastructure just doesn’t seem like a viable pathway to meaningful change in a reasonable time horizon.

    Yes I should take 15 minutes every election cycle to vote for the right person. Beyond that though my input wouldn’t be very valuable.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      The Netherlands went from car dependent nightmare to cycle capital of the world in a generation. Meaningful change takes time but it is possible in our life times and it isn’t going to happen on it’s own.

      Voting is good, talk to your friends. Be that annoying person who won’t shut the fuck up about how annoying cars are, change peoples minds or at least plant the idea in their brain that we can exist without cars.

      Apathy solves nothing.

      • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The netherlands still have a terrible CO2 bilance, which shows that we have to think much bigger than that.

        On the local space have a focus on the climate impact preperation. This might very well safe many lifes in your city/town/village. For the climate change reduction think national and international.