Eugenics? What eugenics? There is no mention of eugenics in this research paper. Just the eco-fascist narrative that climate change isn’t caused by capitalism, but by too many people consuming resources faster than they can be replenished. I’m sure that’s not a dangerous idea useful to anyone or anything.
It’s obvious no serious discussion can be had here.
We’re not talking about eugenics we’re just talking about how much society would be improved if we culled the weak. Nobody is saying anything about eugenics though that would be uncivil
😌
“We acknowledge that humans have enough power to destablise the climate of an entire fucking planet but we also need you to believe that humans are not instrumental in deciding who gets to live and who gets to die based on how we allocate resources because we aren’t powerful enough to do something like that.”
I could unpack this idea, about how card-carrying collapse adherents hold fundamentally incompatible beliefs, but I don’t think that I can be bothered.