I’ve been seeing a lot of talk about CachyOS recently. Has anyone here tried it? It seems interesting and I might give it a go (currently on EndeavourOS) on a spare drive in my PC.

  • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nzM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    If you’re already on Arch/EOS, you don’t need to “move distros”, all you need to do (ish) is to update your pacman.conf with Cachy’s repos and run a pacman -Syuu to reinstall your packages. Oh, and you might also want to install the cachy kernel and maybe the browser for the full experience. Your files and config will remain the same, unless you plan to update/merge them - in which case, I’d recommend replacing your makepkg.conf with the one Cachy provides, for the optimised compiler flags. Other than that, there’s no significant difference between the default configs and Cachy’s. In fact, EndeavourOS actually deviates more since it uses dracut for generating the initrd, whereas Cachy, like Arch, defaults to mkinitcpio.

    Anyways, there’s not much point trying CachyOS in a VM since it’s really not that much different from EndeavourOS (from a UX point of view); the whole point of Cachy is to eke out the best performance from your system, so running it in a VM defeats the purpose.

    • governorkeagan@lemdro.idOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’ve answered another question I had (I asked it in another comment), thank you! I’ll give the kernel and Cachy repo a try on my EOS install and see how it goes. Thanks again for the detailed response, it’s super useful!

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I installed CachyOS on a VM ( Proxmox ) just to check out the OOTB experience and I am glad I did.

      In a lot of ways, it is similar to EOS as you say. That is a compliment as I really like EOS.

      The UX is a bit different though. Lots more blue than purple of course. On the command-line side the differences are bigger. It uses the fish shell with a jazzed up prompt ( reminded me of Garuda ). There are a tonne of aliases. They clearly like Rust as a few of the Rust core util alternatives are installed. They even alias ls to eza.

      Both yay and paru are installed at install which is awesome.

      The default file system was XFS. Btrfs and zfs were both options. No bcachefs at install but it is available after.