• wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    According to the discoverer, this has nothing to do with the event horizon.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The first sentence of the body text in the article:

          “Up to half of the black holes that devour stars “burp up” their stellar remains years later.”

          I recognize that its not an entire sun being sucked in at once and that the black holes presence alone destroys the sun but the parts that are left. Radiation and what not should still be attracted to the black hole and assumingly orbit around its gravity before gething devoured.

          It cant burp something out that was never inside. Or maybe it does but those implications are even more bizar. If it was just “burping out” the surrounding star stuff it wouldn’t be called a burp but “pushed it away again.

          How else am i to interpret this?

          • wahming@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe don’t read too much into the word choice of a non-technical article, and trust the actual astronomer discoverer talking about it?