cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/8299908

The authors argue that centuries of imperialism, extractive capitalism, and population growth have pushed Earth’s ecosystems beyond their limits, and created a broadening pattern of social inequality. The review summarizes the grave threats facing the planet but rejects a “doom and gloom” philosophy. Instead, the authors argue, the threats should motivate swift and substantial actions.

According to the authors, a global economic model focused on wealth accumulation and profit, rather than true sustainability, is a major impediment to decarbonization, conserving natural resources, and ensuring social equity. Therefore, the authors argue, governments should enforce radical, immediate cuts in fossil fuel use, eliminate environmentally harmful subsidies, and restrict trade that generates pollution or unsustainable consumption.

  • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    When people hear the words ‘not sustainable’, I fear that they are not grasping what that implies. If humanity keeps procrastinating on these issues, we are gonna have a bad time.

    • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The people with the power to enact strong, rapid change will be dead when the worst of it hits. So, why the fuck should they care. They got theirs. It is pretty damn disgusting, the lack of empathy, but there is no short term gain from them acting selflessly.