This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

https://lemmy.world/post/3234363

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    376
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Lemmy world:

    Users, not even on Lemmy World or directly affected by this:

    Pissed Pikachu with torch and pitchfork

    I’m not in the loop or even involved with LW’s admin affairs, but I would imagine there was a letter or email to them or their service provider that prompted that and likely named those communities specifically. Going out on a limb, I would guess the community removal was a timely response to something like that, and based on LW’s history, an announcement will probably be coming soon-ish.

    Before you grab your torches and pitchforks, remember: Pretty much every Lemmy instance is run by volunteers that don’t have legal departments.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      136
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “The cloud is just other people’s computers” - It’s inconvenient, but those computers are real, physical objects subject to oversight from real, physical law enforcement.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Remember: Pretty much every Lemmy instance is run by volunteers that don’t have legal departments

      One lawsuit can shut them down.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Never understood people who don’t get this.

        As a person who is part of open source communities, on various chairs and donates, the money is extremely slim, and the people involved just want to build cool things.

        We are busy trying to keep the lights on for hundreds of thousands of people can enjoy this service. And if a small group of troublemakers force us to get a strong legal threat, we aren’t risking the the project’s survival for them.

        Especially when we don’t know the troublemakers, don’t have any connection with them, they don’t contribute to the platform, etc.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Evidence No. 3783 that “social media” and “privacy” do not mix well together.

      Let me repeat one more time:

      • anything you write online should be considered public.
      • There is no “consent-based” fediverse.
      • There is no “GDPR protects me from that”.
      • There is no “security through obscurity”.
      • There is no “dark corner of the internet”.

      No matter your morals and ethical values, If you need to have any type of conversation that you think might get you in legal trouble, do not have this conversation in a public forum. Use #matrix if you have to, and even then you’d still need to worry large group chats which may have some undercover agent.

      And if you are really concerned about “censorship”, then ActivityPub is not for you. Go join forces with the bitcoiners and use #nostr.

      • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh oops, you haven’t pasted some cool copyleft licence below your words on this niche thread on a niche social media network so looks like I might remix and reuse your content without attribution… Unlucky

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        And anything you write or upload to Lemmy should be considered permanent, as it immediately spreads throughout all the instances and they actually don’t have to respect edits or removals. And if instances defederate from each other then they simply can’t, as they don’t sync those requests any more - if Lemmy.World decided to defederate from Sopuli, this message would become permanent and I could not do anything about it.

        Also, this who saga about the uploaded ID picture.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not at all. I myself have been playing with the possibility of adding support to it on Fediverser, to have a place for the mirror bots.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah like.

      This isn’t reddit dot com opaquely purging your favourite subreddit for some unspecific corporate reason.

      The admins stated quite clearly why they are blocking it (“we don’t want trouble, and our TOS lay out that we’ll defed from illegal shit for our own safety”), and it is their instance. And unlike Reddit – The community is still THERE in its home server. It has not been burninated. – You can just. Make an account elsewhere. It’s free. It takes less than 5 minutes. You can even KEEP your LW account for other communities.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        Did the admins state anything? I thought the issue here is that LW previously did something without an announcement, undid it and promised to communicate before doing something like that again, and now people are saying they haven’t communicated this time.

        That’s the real issue, not the fact that it was defederated.

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This is precisely it.
      One other point is, some instance want to focus on certain things, and take the risks, where others don’t.
      Our community feddit.uk doesn’t do nsfw, because it’s not worth the headache for what our main focus is.
      The guy running lemmynsfw on the other hand, is enthusiastically embracing the challenges involved, and more power to him!

      And in the end, it works. We handle Mr. Brains Pork Balls, they can handle…other balls.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Our community feddit.uk doesn’t do nsfw, because it’s not worth the headache for what our main focus is.

        Same for my instance and for the same reasons. We have nothing against that, just, like you said, not our focus nor worth the headache.

        And in the end, it works. We handle Mr. Brains Pork Balls, they can handle…other balls.

        🤣

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I would imagine there was a letter or email to them or their service provider that prompted that and likely named those communities specifically

      What I’m curious about is, why haven’t lemmy.dbzer0.com received those takedown messages? Wouldn’t it make more sense to go to the source instead of just another instance hosting the content but not actually “responsible” for the content, so to speak? Or maybe they have?

      Also curious why lemmy.world has still not made a statement about this or even acknowledged it (at least I haven’t seen any acknowledgement so far). Removing the communities from their instance is of course totally within their power and right, but this isn’t exactly the most transparent way to do it.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        What I’m curious about is, why haven’t lemmy.dbzer0.com received those takedown messages? Wouldn’t it make more sense to go to the source instead of just another instance hosting the content but not actually “responsible” for the content, so to speak? Or maybe they have?

        So many unknowns. Until LW makes an announcement, it’s all speculation. I haven’t seen any mention from db0 about takedowns, etc, but those may just be background noise for him. lol

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          Db0 seems confused based on their comments about this situation over on the piracy community. Said there was zero notice or communication from LW ahead of time

          • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t know the inner politics of it, but I did check lemmy.world/instances and db0 wasn’t on the “blocked” list. AFAIK, based on their modlog, just those two communities were blocked (unless that’s changed since i last looked)

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah something’s going on. As of 10 hours ago Db0 has no idea what exactly that is though, which is odd because I believe typically LW would reach out to him about the offending content if it was a DMCA type thing. Idk

      • ben_dover@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        regarding your first question - they usually go after the big fish first. dbzer0 might still be flying under the radar, and also might be ina different jurisdiction where the specific plaintiff can’t go after them, or where it’s harder for them to do so

    • satxdude@lemm.ee
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The thing that gets me is the quote in the OP from last time this happened. It has been +12 hours of silence when you said last time they’d have this discussion BEFORE. Maybe it’s for legal reasons but you’d think they’d have said well, something.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      People speaking out and getting mad is natural and helpful. It’s how discourse works at this scale. Maybe the mods change their actions or maybe they don’t, but saying nothing about bad things happening won’t help anyone and getting mad that others are saying things is stupid.

    • antidote101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      8 months ago

      Are you telling me Reddit is free to have a Piracy sub, but Lemmy isn’t?

      What’s the point of Lemmy if Reddit is more free?

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Reddit is an American company, subject to American laws, that has a legal department (i.e. has lawyers on retainer). Lemmy World, like most other instances, is run by volunteers and donations and is subject to the laws where it’s hosted and/or where its operators reside.

        When you receive a takedown / DMCA / whatever legal mumbo-jumbo applies to your jurisdiction, you have two choices:

        • Comply immediately
        • Fight it in court

        The first option is free. The second option costs a lot of money if you don’t already have lawyers on retainer and can cost even more money if the court rules against you.

        Sucks, but that’s the way it is.

        Again, I’m only speculating that was the case here. However, given Germany is one of the jurisdictions LW is accountable to, it’s not that wild of a guess.

        In most EU nations, piracy is usually not even a blip on the radar for security forces and internet providers. Things seem to work completely differently in Germany, where breaking copyright law can carry a sentence of up to three years in jail, alongside a large fine and trial costs. - Source


        What’s the point of Lemmy if Reddit is more free?

        That’s such a broad question that I’m not even going to bother. Instead, I’ll answer with the same question as when “states’ rights” are brought up:

        States’ rights Free to do what, exactly?”

        You’re also free to run your own instance and accept all the legal liabilities that come with that.

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          When you receive a takedown / DMCA / whatever legal mumbo-jumbo applies to your jurisdiction, you have two choices:

          Comply immediately
          Fight it in court
          

          You actually have a third option: file a DMCA Counternotice. If my reading is correct, the very act of filing the counternotice allows you to keep the content up unless the original filer “insists” (it’s the mechanism against “DMCA trolling”). DMCAis not a jail-free card to erase content from the internet.

          • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Possibly, but the DMCA is strictly a US thing. The comply or fight in court are the only two somewhat universal options.

            Other countries have other similar laws, though. LW’s TOS says they’re under legal jurisdiction of Finland, The Netherlands, and Germany. Not sure what their laws are like, but Germany seems pretty strict about it.

            • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Could be, but still it reeks of overreaction. Without the need of seeing anything else, it’s almost impossible that Germany’s law is that strict that “linking to (discussion of) pirated material” would be off, since if that was the case Google would be making Germany rich with their fines, which doesn’t seem to be the case. It’s even worse when it comes down to saying “discussing or mentioning” internet piracy would be illegal - under the way copyright holders themselves understand it, this would mean mentioning the market of secondhand sales would be illegal in such jurisdictions.

              • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Yeah, until LW addresses it, all we can really do is guess. I’ve just jumped to the most logical conclusion, but that doesn’t mean it’s even close.

                For what it’s worth, as an instance admin myself: I don’t get paid to run it, I have other things to worry about, and most definitely don’t have time or energy to deal with copyright BS. That said, I can completely understand their position and reaction.

                Depending on how my day was going, I’d have also probably “shot first and asked questions later” with regard to removing the community and waiting until I had time to compose a post about it and be present to deal with the inevitable drama that would cause.

                Hopefully they make an announcement soon.

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        You seem to be confusing Lemmy.world with Lemmy as a whole. Lemmy is free to be used for anything by anyone.

        Lemmy.world is the largest and most mainstream Lemmy server, so they need to be especially careful about legal issues. If lemmy.world gets taken down due to mirroring content hosted on lemmy.dbzer0.com, the whole network would partially collapse because of how many users and communities are hosted on lemmy.world.

        It’s not even close to worth the risk. This is how federation is supposed to work.

          • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s definitely not ideal to be this centralized around lemmy.world. But it’s also nearly impossible to prevent some amount of centralization, especially at our current size. With only 50k active users, we don’t have enough people to sustain activity if things were more spread out.

            It’s still so early. If we get to 500k or 5M users, things will naturally get way more decentralized. A year ago, about 70-80% of the whole network was basically centralized on lemmy.ml. I dont have the exact numbers because I wasn’t here yet, but looking back at the stats there were only a few thousand active users at that time and the vast majority were on lemmy.ml

            Now, only about 40% of the network is on lemmy.world (20k/50k users). I just think there are natural incentives that will continue to push us in the direction of decentralization, but we haven’t quite reached the tipping point where that starts to happen.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              If we get to 500k or 5M users, things will naturally get way more decentralized.

              What makes you think that? I abandoned my kbin account because all the content is on lemmy and I don’t feel like waiting 4 hours to get that content on kbin. People will go where the content is.

              • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                That’s just because kbin doesn’t work properly though. One reason why things are centralized is because there are only so many servers that actually work well.

                Events like this removal of the piracy community will naturally cause people to spread out over time. You could even see people try to spread out on reddit by making new subs when they chafed at the rules.

                The more people we have, the more diverse we will become, and thus it will be necessary to create new servers to accommodate these different types of people. That’s my instinct, but there are many different ways it could go.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Content loads just as fast on small subs as on large subs. Not so for instances. I think centralization is inevitable unless federated data transfer gets faster.

            • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              Centralization is a product of social behavior. People will gravitate to the place everyone else is. They won’t “decentralize” naturally.

              • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Sometimes people centralize, and sometimes they decentralize. They are both natural social behaviors.

                If people naturally gravitate to the place everyone is, why are we all on Lemmy instead of reddit? Why do I have absolutely no desire to be a part of lemmy.world, where everyone else is? People are not all the same.

          • Blaze@dormi.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It definitely has. Hopefully this decision will nudge people into other instances.

          • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m not from lemmy.world, I’m from sh.itjust.works. We have never banned you at all. And I understand your argument.

            But it’s not our place to decide what the lemmy.world admins do with their server. It also doesn’t affect you personally at all. It’s not like they defederated your server, it only affects their users who were subscribed to that community, and they can always just make an account on another server.

      • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        the dbzer0 piracy community has been around much longer than most of the users here. they spun up when they saw the writing on the wall, and they permit things that would not be permitted on reddit. and, it seems, they permit things that are not permitted on .world.

        but the instance is still there. the community is still there.

        and you can leave .world, join an instance that hasn’t banned !piracy, and keep right on going.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        You know the meme where Bender goes, “I’ll do my own thing, with Blackjack and hookers!”

        Lemme provides that. Servers are managed by different groups and you can absolutely make your own, with blackjacks and hookers.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Great thing about the fediverse is that you have options when admin/moderation actions occur that you don’t agree with. If Reddit were to remove /r/piracy then we’d have no recourse

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Very true…as long as the federation of servers remains as it is now, but I’m increasingly worried it won’t.

      I mean, yes, Dbzer0 still exists, and yes, you can access it from other instances, but Lemmy.world is the biggest one and users here being cut off from it from here will strangle the amount of activity it gets. Visibility is important for the health of other instances and their communities. There’s a good reason why alternative subreddits never outgrow the main ones.

      There’s also a sentiment among some admins and some of the contributors to both Lemmy and the Sublinks project that feels like it runs counter to the premise of Lemmy as whole: an unwillingness commit to a truly shared space or adhere to a standard for what federation is supposed to mean. Instances are not only encouraged to do whatever, they’re being given more tools to. And that’s good for fighting spam, child porn, and malicious instances, but it doesn’t stop there.

      I really hope an app or frontend comes along at some point that will seamlessly combine instance accounts and “fill in the blanks” created by instance admins so users can have a clear picture of Lemmy, regardless of the instance they’re on.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, yes, Dbzer0 still exists, and yes, you can access it from other instances, but Lemmy.world is the biggest one and users here being cut off from it from here will strangle the amount of activity it gets. Visibility is important for the health of other instances and their communities. There’s a good reason why alternative subreddits never outgrow the main ones.

        Yes and no. While it’s true that piracy might not get “drive-by” traffic from l.w. users, those users who become aware of it, or who want to access it will be forced to create an account elsewhere than l.w. which will also help with redistributing users to smaller instances.

  • Handles@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is why you don’t sign up with the biggest possible instances, eventually they will become the biggest possible bottleneck in a network. Anything dot world admins do will affect all of their users, that shouldn’t be surprising 🤷

    As for dbzer0, this might affect users in the short term but eventually people will figure out how to access the sub from more friendly instances.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah that. And I say it as someone who, on a good day, will go on philosophical rambles about how piracy is in fact the moral thing to do.

      Do people just not get that this is the entire point of a decentralized system?

      Hop accounts, you lil’ bitch. Don’t sit in one server complaining about the owner of that server when you have a billion options.

      And if your priority is the piracy community? Make the server that hosts that your homeserver.

      Or just have more than one account and use an app instead of the default webpage.

      It’s not rocket science. People’s brains are poisoned by centralization. Back in my day everything was its own separate forum with its own separate account and to be honest, it was miles better like that.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The problem with this is that it isn’t really decentralized equally. Lemmy.world has most of the users and getting defederated from them is essentially a death sentence in terms of content and engagement.

        I think it’s a good idea to make new accounts on other instances, I plan to but without a proper amount of people, lemmy.world is working the same way reddit did.

        • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The problem with this is that it isn’t really decentralized equally. Lemmy.world has most of the users and getting defederated from them is essentially a death sentence in terms of content and engagement.

          Self-resolving issue here. If people hop away from LW due to LW making decisions they don’t like, LW will cease being the one-go-to-place for stuff. Which is good, it shouldn’t be. No one instance should be “the main instance”. The right way to use federation is each person & community should make their home at a place where they vibe just right with the fed admins. It’s even good for LW itself as it reduces the burden on its server and the workload for its admins.

          Also also – Defederation is a far more nuanced thing than just “is block”. There is more than one tool that can be used by an ActivityPub admin.

          If LW defederates from your home instance – You can still manually follow communities that are in LW AND interact with them (unless the admins go out of their way to ALSO block USERS from your home instance), as “defederated from the instance” just removes it from the global timeline/global community search.

          What happened here, though, wasn’t defederation, it was a block, and a block on two specific communities, which outright prevents viewing & interacting with content from those communities from within LW. Which brings me to: LW’s block on the piracy communities from dbzer0 doesn’t stop LW users from interacting with dbzer0 as a whole. Or vice-versa. Only with stuff from the piracy coms.

        • Blaze@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hopefully this will drive people to switch to another instance, and the issue you mentions will be less present.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      I did that the last time and moved here ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

      Better management, no censorship, better uptimes and quicker upgrades, no need to look back (I moved “momentarily”).

      • Blaze@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        quicker upgrades

        That’s an important one, especially with how long it took LW to upgrade. I completely get why it’s more challenging for them due to their number of users, but that could be an argument for enthusiastic users to move elsewhere.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Great question, see when instances have management level disagreements like this there really isn’t any purpose to using their communities from a remote account.

          Unlike a lot of people who “migrated” I realize it ultimately doesn’t make a difference using these communities from a remote server because they are controlled by this one and ultimately will be affected by defederations and bans. So I only migrated my non-lemmy.world subscriptions to the other instance accounts and left the local ones on this account.

    • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      8 months ago

      Reddit syndrome still affects a lot of users here, who view having multiple accounts on different answers as an inconvenience instead of a feature of the platform design. The irony is that tons of users on Reddit had lots of accounts without batting an eye, but that extra step of having to lick a new instance is just SO complicated.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is an inconvenience. Having to track which account can view which communities, with all the drama and defederation happening each week isn’t easy.

        • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          Picking a better instance for your main is most advisable. Users can accept that the primary benefit of a free and open source federated service can also sometimes inconvenience them, or they cannot. Complaining about the core mechanic of the technology that literally cannot change is silly IMO. Corporate owned centralization leads to enshittification. Your account age indicates that you know that first hand.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Indeed. There are lots of proposals for perfectly portable decentralized user identities, subscriptions that transcend specific instances, and whatnot, but until those things actually arrive that’s not the Fediverse we’re dealing with. It’s a hassle having to switch instances.

        • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          8 months ago

          Centralized Reddit brain poison tbh.

          Your password manager will keep track of your credentials. If you have THAT MUCH trouble keeping track of which communities are on which server, stick to local communities.

          Back in the day we had everything be its own separate forum and no one died from that. You’re just lazy.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a major inconvenience and I’ll stick to one. If it can’t be accessed from Lemmy.world it’s not really my problem tbh and I’ll just act like it doesn’t exist.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve never noticed any defederation from my instance or drama aside from the main posts talking about it, and if you came here interested in a piracy community it’s good for that, lemmy.dbzer0.com. “Lemmy.World” seems to be where all the drama happens hah. I have only ever made one account, interact with several different instances without issue. I agree using several accounts would be annoying.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This isn’t reddit. There’s a clear solution here: decentralization. Aka, like the entire point why we’re on Lemmy in the first place. Join another instance lol.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah people are really weird about this. They want a free distributed forum hosted by small admins, but don’t want those individuals to take basic legal precautions? Piracy might be moral, but it’s a liability which will absolutely impact the viability of servers in many places. Grow up.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The Lemmy instance doesn’t actually host pirated content, does it? It’s just information about pirated content and where to find it, right? Who the fuck cares about this

        • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I guess the question is: if you host a public forum, are you liable for things posted on it, or on separate but linked forums?

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              It doesn’t matter if you don’t have limitless money to pay lawyers

              Since anyone can spin up a Lemmy server, at some point a rich person/persons will do so, which makes this a relevant question to ask.

            • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              Comments like this sound like the “they write it off on tax” comments, where there’s this assumption about how complex things must work, but it can’t work exactly that way otherwise we would see it happening all the time.

          • castlebravo404@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            You might not have to pay damages. But you’re probably going to have to pay a hefty legal fee not to pay damages.

            • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              Copyright laws are actually very difficult to enforce when it comes to digital piracy. You have to prove loss of profit among other things.

              Then, who do you sue? The person downloading the product? The person hosting the product? The person providing a link to the hosted data? The person providing a platform for people to link things? The person who allows their platform to federate with another platform that does?

              If we’re talking about P2P sharing, then in a way no one is hosting the data.

              In Australia when the Dallas Buyers Club case was being looked at, the studio was asking for a lot of money. Basically a big fat fine to be paid. The judge threw it out saying that the only reasonable damages for one person to pay would be the cost of the DVD because that was the value of the “theft”.

              • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                8 months ago

                You dont have to enforce it.

                You just have to drown people in legal bills and force them into compliance with risk of bankruptcy.

                • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t know enough about law to know how that does or does not work, but it that’s possible then any entity with enough money can actively bankrupt anyone they want, and it won’t have anything to do with why. If that’s true could you not just sue someone by making stuff up and force them to prove you made it up?

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I guess the question is: if you host a public forum, are you liable for things posted on it, or on separate but linked forums?

            I was thinking the same thing, as a legal question.

            In the Fediverse, who’s the source/target for the law to look at, the originator, or all the cached copies on other servers?

            Edit: Basically, what this comment describes…

            Then, who do you sue? The person downloading the product? The person hosting the product? The person providing a link to the hosted data? The person providing a platform for people to link things? The person who allows their platform to federate with another platform that does?

            If we’re talking about P2P sharing, then in a way no one is hosting the data.

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    When “reddit outside of reddit” does reddit things 🫨

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair, Rudd is just a hobbyist who runs .world in his spare time. If he’s getting legal pressure, he’s probably going to cover his ass. He’s not a company with a legal dept. He’s a guy with a family and a day job.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Another problem is .world part of US-centric instance

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      When the people using a free service you’re not obligated to provide try and shame you for not taking on multimillion dollar legal departments.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        The communities they banned are only for the discussion of piracy(whick is legal). There are no copyrighted material hosted in any of them.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It doesn’t matter if they’re blessed by the Pope himself. The people who run the instance get to decide what moves through it.

          • lorty@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yes, and I can voice my dissatisfaction with it. I’m not sure what your point is other than trying to tell me to shut up in a more verbose way.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The benefit is that it isn’t just another reddit but rather network of reddits

      Banned on one? Get from another.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m referring specifically to lemmy.world, not to all of lemmy or even the fediverse.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sad that antipiracy laws are in place.

    But understandable that lemmy.world protect themselves against those unfair laws.

    The sailing will continue, but, as always, we should be wary of the “navy” and sail with precaution.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      No. Every community is hosted by a server, just as every user account is. Removing a community is similar to banning a user.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        So it just means that lemmy.world users can no longer see that specific community, right?

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          8 months ago

          No, it means the community no longer functions and most posts to it aren’t available on other servers either. You can view some remnants of it on other servers, but I’m not sure what will happen if you try to post to them.

          • satxdude@lemm.ee
            cake
            OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            No that’s not correct because the community they banned was not on their instance.

            All this does is prevent Lemmy.World users from using or seeing the community. Everyone else is unaffected.

            • Zak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              I misunderstood which community was being discussed. You’re correct.

              • A server banning a community it hosts effectively destroys that community
              • A server banning a community it does not host makes that server’s users unable to interact with it

              That’s very similar to banning a user.

  • Iapar@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Spin up a piracy instance on a server in China or Russia and be done with it.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          A Russian word play around Roskomnadzor, i.e. The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media, an agency responsible, among other things, for censoring media and blocking access to Internet resources, as well as proceeding with criminal allegations on illegal content.

          Pozor (Позор) means “shame”.