what the hell is right speech?
I can probably translate, given the context
It’s “evil/leftist/PC/woke/liberal/sanitised” thoughts, written or spoken, that’s sarcastically called right speech as a way to mock and bemoan the fact that using slurs, punching down, and harassment (particularly towards genuinely marginalised people) etc, is becoming ever the less tolerated by a majority of humans.
According to the votes my post constitutes “wrong speech”.
How would you classify it. Slur? Harassment?
I don’t know how @HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world would classify it, but I’d classify it as pretty obvious JAQing off. Hope that helps!
Thanks man. You are a true asset to the conversation.
Stupid and whiny
Well I suppose that kind of speech has its attraction in a nihilistic kind of way.
Politically correct.
Speech that we like. You can tell by the votes.
Deluxe speech, now with iodine
If this question is “Would you rather everyone be able to talk, or just people who are correct?” Then, uhm, correct according to who?
I prefer having a range of forums of different functions, from “Only my friends can speak” to “everyone, save for those who use speech to harass or intimidate, can speak” to “only the teacher can speak.” None of those fit neatly into either category here (even teachers are sometimes wrong).
Removed by mod
pissbaby?
See, you’re allowed to say pissbaby, now what was it you wanted free speech to say?
Our rules prohibit intentionally annoying, mocking, or harassing other members. Please find a way to make your point without name-calling.
Please find a way to make your point without name-calling.
No.
It depends.
Should governments regulate what you can or have to say? No (except if you threaten someone, call for physical violence etc.)
Should individual people have the ability to ban you from their property or web service because of what you say? Yes (I prefer if they don’t but it should still be their right to do so)
Should businesses? Yes but probably not arbitrarily
What about spaces that can be seen as public forums? It’s complicated, maybe it should be handled on a case by case basis
But how about you? Which one do you, personally, prefer?
You have the power of the vote after all. The choice is entirely yours.
I don’t really understand your question. Like I wrote in my comment, I prefer to handle it depending on context.
Free* speech.
*With purchase of speech of greater or equal value, at participating locations, some terms and conditions apply. Offer void where prohibited. No cash substitutions allowed.
free leech
Freeze peach
I do beseech.
That’s a bit of a reach.
I’m a free speech absolutist.
Free speech.
wtf is right speech?
Speech that is popularly approved of basically. Or authoritatively approved of maybe, if you have one of those.
Votes are a good judge of that. Look at the votes on my post.
