This isn’t a great argument. There is so much open undeveloped space in the US that could be used to house people. This interchange isn’t taking space away from anyone.
What do you propose they do with that space? Adding literally any way to access it necessarily interferes with the roads around it and makes the entire project pointless.
Even ignoring that obvious problem, you can’t use it for housing since there’s nothing there and it’s surrounded by high-speed traffic. Can’t build shops or other amenities there since nobody stops and it’s surrounded by high-speed traffic. You definitely can’t put livestock there.
That wasn’t the argument I was responding to. The initial argument was that the interchange was taking away space that could be used to house people. Simply replacing the interchange with housing would cause even larger problems than developing the empty land around it.
I’d say you’re technically correct in saying that we can do everything, whereas the other point is that since other species are also affected by our decisions we shouldn’t
![[image] Thank the gods we live in such a car-saturated nation, how horrible it would be if this space was used to house people](https://media.kbin.social/media/25/d4/25d433f60f90bd740795361249180a0e53a20d9c879facc988a4ad353113fb2e.jpg){kind=link}
This isn’t a great argument. There is so much open undeveloped space in the US that could be used to house people. This interchange isn’t taking space away from anyone.
This isn’t a great argument. A majority of highway interchanges in city limits have actually displaced people.
this interchange is in the city of Houston. of course it’s taking space away.
Those giant empty fields right below it are even larger…
Gee, I wonder why people don’t want to live next to a highway interchange.
And then deal with all the car noise pollution? No thanks.
What do you propose they do with that space? Adding literally any way to access it necessarily interferes with the roads around it and makes the entire project pointless.
Even ignoring that obvious problem, you can’t use it for housing since there’s nothing there and it’s surrounded by high-speed traffic. Can’t build shops or other amenities there since nobody stops and it’s surrounded by high-speed traffic. You definitely can’t put livestock there.
That wasn’t the argument I was responding to. The initial argument was that the interchange was taking away space that could be used to house people. Simply replacing the interchange with housing would cause even larger problems than developing the empty land around it.
depends on how myopic is your definition of “anyone” is
“space” isn’t for humans only. roads are taking monstrous amounts of space
Humans won the planet, they can do as they please. (Including damn themselves, but all belongs to us)
if you want to provoke, you should try to write something less immature.
go play with your xbox
I’m not being edgy, the planet and all consequences belong to us.
Is there another dominant species around I haven’t met yet?
I’d say you’re technically correct in saying that we can do everything, whereas the other point is that since other species are also affected by our decisions we shouldn’t
That’s the consequences part
Go tell that to the people displaced by Robert Moses.
In Texas?
It’s not just about how much space, but where that space is.