0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoOh boy, goodie!sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1654arrow-down116
arrow-up1638arrow-down1imageOh boy, goodie!sh.itjust.works0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squaredoctorcrimson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up92arrow-down5·edit-29 months agodeleted by creator
minus-square0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up110arrow-down1·11 months agoIt’s tomorrow in some places 😂.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-211 months agoWould using a VPN make posting it from NZ illegal right after midnight if the IP is logged from a country not past midnight?
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 months agoThat sounds to me like it’s probably correct. 👍
minus-squarejaschen@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down2·11 months agoNot really. I think it’s considered free speech if it’s sarcastic or a parody.
minus-squaredoctorcrimson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·edit-29 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarejaschen@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoThanks for the clarification.
minus-squareADTJ@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months ago" If Disney sues, we’ll claim fair use… Ho hi! "
minus-squarespicy pancake@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 months ago“hi ho, hi ho, it’s off to court we go…”
minus-squareschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·11 months agoAnd fair use exists to protect free speech.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·11 months agoYes, the infamous “sarcastic” exception to copyright.
minus-squarevoidMainVoid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 months agoIt’s still illegal. This version of Mickey Mouse is still covered under trademark law.
minus-squareKrafty Kactus@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoWhat do you mean? What part of this infringes on copyright?
minus-squarevoidMainVoid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-210 months agoTrademark. Not copyright. And the part that is covered is Mickey. This could also be covered under copyright, since the only Mickey that went into public domain is the one from Steamboat Willie, not this one. I’m not a lawyer, though.
minus-squareKrafty Kactus@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoThis is the one from steamboat willy though
minus-squarelapommedeterre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·11 months agoAs of 2024, Micky is now public domain, at least the variant from Steamboat Willie.
deleted by creator
It’s tomorrow in some places 😂.
deleted by creator
Would using a VPN make posting it from NZ illegal right after midnight if the IP is logged from a country not past midnight?
deleted by creator
That sounds to me like it’s probably correct. 👍
Probably.
Are you from the future?
I am now.
They used to be
Not really. I think it’s considered free speech if it’s sarcastic or a parody.
deleted by creator
Thanks for the clarification.
" If Disney sues, we’ll claim fair use…
Ho hi! "
“hi ho, hi ho, it’s off to court we go…”
And fair use exists to protect free speech.
Yes, the infamous “sarcastic” exception to copyright.
It’s still illegal. This version of Mickey Mouse is still covered under trademark law.
What do you mean? What part of this infringes on copyright?
Trademark. Not copyright. And the part that is covered is Mickey.
This could also be covered under copyright, since the only Mickey that went into public domain is the one from Steamboat Willie, not this one. I’m not a lawyer, though.
This is the one from steamboat willy though
Why?
As of 2024, Micky is now public domain, at least the variant from Steamboat Willie.