- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
It’s not a “risk” it’s a “hazard assement”.
It’s not a food safety agency it’s just the World Health Organization’s cancer research arm.
This certainly doesn’t stir up mistrust.
It’s not a “risk” it’s a “hazard assement”.
It’s not a food safety agency it’s just the World Health Organization’s cancer research arm.
This certainly doesn’t stir up mistrust.
deleted by creator
Well i am reacting to my experience with it and new developments.
Don’t know how much big artificial sweetener is but apparently this hit someone’s nerve to bring all the defenders to the yard. After all the decades of intense lobbying, bribery, and shady legal and buisness practices to ram it through approvals.
As for the China does it - China’s Sweetener Makers Advance on WHO Aspartame Speculation
Someone’s apple cart is definitely getting a reactionary response in the market.
oh, i’m all for replacing aspartame with sucralose, the superior sweetener that doesn’t leave an aftertaste akin to licking lightbulbs. but we got two scare-mongering pieces of news regarding artificial sweeteners in a row, and the news that popped up didn’t cover it with the proper nuance and could be easily interpreted as “sugar better”, so I strongly suspect sugar lobbying is at play here (non-sugar sweeteners have gained incredible ground over sugar itself on processed food and especially beverages), and I’m surpised someone who is so suspicious about science communication isn’t picking up this obvious a scent.