This company sounds like it’s in its death throes.

  • Carrot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I paid $100 a handful of years ago, and it felt worth it at the time. Jellyfin has improved tremendously in that time, adding intro/outro skip, a tizen app, better collections support, and is super snappy comparatively. I thought my streaming server was to blame for the long buffer times at the start of media, but clearly not because Jellyfin starts almost as soon as the player loads in. Plex has gotten worse, more invasive, more expensive, and more sluggish since then. I’ll never look back to Plex. What value they offer on top of Jellyfin’s functionality (which is shrinking year by year) isn’t worth the $2 per phone per month for my new users. I made the switch for ~20 family/friends, and other than the name, people only had praises for Jellyfin.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Your users don’t have to pay anything if you have a Plex pass…….

      Also I doubt you have other users, externally, if you switched to jellyfin as it’s not made for that, nor should it be used for that.

      • Carrot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        As far as I know they do for remote streaming on phones, if they weren’t part of my server at the time they introduced the monthly remote streaming subscription. I tried to add a new user after it was introduced, and to use Plex to access content from my server on their phone they no longer had the option to pay the $5 or whatever, they had to sign up for a $2 a month subscription. I don’t know if this may have been walked back in the last few months, but at the time it was true.

        I don’t sell access or anything like that, I’ve just got friends and family with access. It fluctuates, but right now it’s sitting at 17 external accounts. I host on the public internet. Despite it being not recommended in general, it’s actually safe to do so if proper precautions are taken. (Correct firewall settings, force https, reverse proxy, scheduled updates, etc.) There are a few extra things I do, but just those should be safe enough if your users aren’t reusing passwords.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          No, before the remote pass they had to pay a one-time fee, but since they added the remote pass subscription as long as the plex server admin has a plex pass no-one has to pay a cent.

          https://support.plex.tv/articles/requirements-for-remote-playback-of-personal-media/

          Since 2025-04-29, there are new requirements for allowing remote playback of video personal media from a Plex Media Server (that is, streaming when not on the same local network as the server). These requirements apply to apps that have been updated to our new experience, such as our mobile app, and will also apply to other platforms as we progress.

          When using an affected app/platform to stream personal video content remotely from a Plex Media Server, then one of the following needs to be true:

          • The admin account for the Plex Media Server has an active Plex Pass (which also allows remote playback for any other user streaming from that server)

          • Your account has an active Plex Pass

          • Your account has an active Remote Watch Pass

          but just those should be safe enough if your users aren’t reusing passwords.

          So you’ve put your server/networks security in the hands of 17 other people’s password policies, and you think that’s “actually safe to do so if proper precautions are taken”?

          I’ve got 20+ friends and family who use my Plex server, only a few have ever paid a cent (when they had the one time fee for mobile streaming), and my server and networks security is not at the risk of someone using the password “password”.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        It literally is made for that. And yes the security issues chat keep getting fixed and workout to someone streaming a random item maybe. Much easier for them to download or watc on YouTube.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          The biggest security issues are “out of scope” because making a secure open-to-the-web media hosting platform is hard, especially for free. The devs have just flat out said they’re not doing it.

          Everything that people do to get remote streaming working is either incredibly insecure, or a workaround that means most people can’t stream from your library on the devices that they want to.