This is the second time someone’s said this to me recently, which is weird because of how obviously wrong it is. How is it hypocrisy if I’m making a choice that also reduces suffering to plants? It’s just complete nonsense, the argument is either uninformed or bad faith, so it doesn’t demonstrate anything.
“In kind” wtf are you talking about? “In kind” would be refuting my arguments logically. The problem being that your position completely fell apart, so you can’t.
It’s not about pretending to be a plant’s rights activist, it’s about showing the hypocrisy of where the valuing life cutoff is (i.e. cute animals).
This is the second time someone’s said this to me recently, which is weird because of how obviously wrong it is. How is it hypocrisy if I’m making a choice that also reduces suffering to plants? It’s just complete nonsense, the argument is either uninformed or bad faith, so it doesn’t demonstrate anything.
You would understand if you still lived in reality.
Lmao, stuck because your whole argument completely fell apart? Just drop a conversational instawin!
Just replying in kind.
“In kind” wtf are you talking about? “In kind” would be refuting my arguments logically. The problem being that your position completely fell apart, so you can’t.
In kind in this context means I’m giving the same level of responses. Obviously, logic would be far outside that level.
Well, you certainly haven’t used an ounce of it this conversation.
Likewise.