• velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They literally provide two examples on quality of work vs time spent on work before the song link.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Those two examples are not evidence, they are suppositions. They may be fine suppositions, but the poster provided a link that appears, by context, to be actual evidence. I respected the poster enough to ask what they meant by the song instead of just dismissing it.

      • velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Are you seriously asking for evidence on this? That some work should be done meticulously and some work can be done quickly and that it can be situational?

        Really?

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I was asking about the song. Thats it. If you want to listen to a 3+ minute song to get a better understanding of the poster, you’re welcome to. I’m not. If you want to accept the poster’s points without the song, you’re welcome to. I was interested in the poster’s viewpoint. They included a song which appeared to hold a large part of their viewpoint with respect to an experience with a teacher. I still have no idea what they’re talking about with the song. They communicated they aren’t interested in explaining more. I’ve accepted that. If you really want to wrap yourself around the axle on this feel free. I won’t be responding to you anymore.