• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s pure profit, not counting surplus re-invested into production and expansion, and moreover this wealth extends year over year as reproduction occurs on an expanded scale.

    • spacesatan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well it was net operating income, so before reinvestment expenses. But are you trying to count all future profits from reinvested wealth? Why not just say they extract infinite value then.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        Fair, but my point is that the lion’s share expands exponentially, not linearly, nor is it all consumed every year.

        • spacesatan@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah from a macro perspective the snowball effect of capital leads to extremely unfair wealth distribution. But the image is from a micro perspective. Wages are closer to 60%-80% of profit produced and the image is claiming it’s like 20%.

          The image is kind of a bad way to portray the underlying problem. The skimming of wealth from the working class is real but the rate isn’t as dramatic as the image claims.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 days ago

            The rate is massive at this point, considering how long it has been going on, especially due to imperierialism. You’re referring to the labor aristocracy exclusively when you say 13,000 isn’t life changing.