The negative impact on the climate from passenger vehicles, which is considerable, could have dropped by more than 30% over the past decade if not for the world’s appetite for large cars, a new report from the Global Fuel Economy Initiative suggests.

Sport utility vehicles, or SUVs, now account for more than half of all new car sales across the globe, the group said, and it’s not alone. The International Energy Agency, using a narrower definition of SUV, estimates they make up nearly half.

Over the years these cars have gotten bigger and so has their cost to the climate, as carbon dioxide emissions “are almost directly proportional to fuel use” for gas-powered cars. The carbon that goes in at the pump comes out the tailpipe.

Transportation is responsible for around one-quarter of all the climate-warming gases that come from energy, and much of that is attributable to passenger transport, according to the International Energy Agency.

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bullshit! Auto makers are not offering small vehicles anymore.

    This is because it’s harder to pass new emission standards if the vehicles are smaller. So they take the easy way and build larger vehicles. This is nothing new and blaming customers or the market for this trend is short sighted.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      My wife used to drive a Smart Car for work in Boston. Smart is owned by Mercedes, and they shuttered their Boston Smart dealership a few years ago. There was virtually zero demand for them in the area, despite being perfect city vehicles.

      My wife and I would regularly drive it in the city and never had an issue finding parking. I couldn’t tell you how many times we encountered SUVs trying to squeeze into a tight parking spot and eventually giving up, only for us to pull in and park with no problem.

      • natebluehooves@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As the owner of a 2016 smart fortwo, they are too expensive, and servicing can be expensive due to mercedes benz. Cute cars, but the price sucks.

    • MahnaMahna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Automakers also just aren’t making enough small EVs, and we can’t afford/don’t want a bigger one. We want a small, efficient about-town car that we can use for doing groceries and going downtown. We both work mostly from home, and the only reason we were even considering another car is because we have a kid on the way and might sometimes need 2 cars to split between errands and kid duties. We’ll just stick to our current, fully paid off car for now and wait either until the prices for new cars drop or the battery technology improves so I feel better about buying a used EV.

    • SharkyPants@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is a double edged sword; It is easier for auto makes to make a profit on larger vehicles. Example of Ford discontinuing all cars in US except mustang in 2019 because of profitability. Americans feel they must compete in the road arms race because they do not feel safe with larger and larger vehicles. There is more demand for bigger vehicles and bigger vehicles make more profit, naturally this will explode into every manufacturer making larger things.

      Next up: Caterpillar will release their ASV (armored security vehicle) to the civilian market and it sells like hotcakes!

    • TechAnon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, but most customers are still buying. I haven’t liked any of the new offerings so I’m driving my old car and fixing it. If I had to buy, I’d go straight to the used market.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Auto makers are not offering small vehicles anymore.

      …what? You can’t buy sedans? Mid-size? Compact?

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the US? We’ve got four door sedans and basically nothing smaller. When it comes to trucks, everything’s huge. No mid-size or compacts.

    • distractionfactory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally having smaller cars available to buy would help. There are very few cheaper aka smaller car options, and even fewer that are marketed well. They have no reason to make small cars when they have spent decades cultivating the market for SUVs and trucks.

      • rab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Agree also. I wish we could buy a 1.2L engine car with a 5 speed transmission and manual windows. No iPad on the dash. That is all anyone needs, extremely simple to repair, low impact, but alas…

        And as someone who needs a truck, why can’t we just buy a simple body on frame pickup with a single cab and an 8ft bed anymore? It is so hard to buy a truck these days that can actually do work. I don’t need an entertainment system or heated leather seats in my truck lol.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          My parents have a '93 Ford ranger, single cab, 7ft bed, 4cylinder engine, manual locks and windows. It’s been plenty of truck for just about anything we’ve ever needed a truck for, and for a 30 year old vehicle it manages to get around 20mpg, which is not to shabby even for a lot of modern trucks or SUVs.

          I would love to be able to buy pretty much exactly that truck with a roughly equivalent modern engine that gets as good or better MPG and maybe a small horsepower boost. I don’t need it to be a towing/hauling monster, or go faster or anything, I just need it to carry some lumber from the hardware store to my house, some camping gear a few times a year, the occasional couch or refrigerator, and maybe once in a blue moon a small load of firewood.

          I also would not mind 4wd/AWD, because that truck is kind of shit in any kind of bad weather or gravel, but I don’t exactly plant to go off-roading with it or anything, the worst it would ever be likely to see is some shitty gravel roads or parking lots in national parks, so that’s negotiable, I just have to not drive like a moron.

  • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are buyers going for bigger cars because they actually want them, or because manufacturers are pushing them harder due to tax breaks and emission laws?

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s been shown through statistics: People who drive Trucks and SUVs mostly use them to pick up the kids from soccer practice and haul groceries. Only a sliver of them actually use their trucks for hauling anything.

    They really need to start owning it and just driving fucking minivans, they drive the “big truck” to make up for their flaccid, basic lives.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you really calling people basic and flaccid and suggesting they should drive a van because it fits that description? I’m not sure who you’re talking to, but that’s not painting a picture of a vehicle anyone would ever buy.

      I own a minivan because I give zero shits what you or anyone else think about what I drive, but our next vehicle will be a SUV because minivans aren’t actually superior in any way once your kids are over about 7, and they aren’t really commonly made. Beyond Toyota, who even makes them? Chrysler has gone from the Town & Country to the Pacifica which is basically an SUV with sliding doors. No one wants minivans so no one makes them. Probably because people call them basic and flaccid.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can confirm. Have an aunt who is like 5’5" and drives a Toyota RAV4.

      Never uses it for anything she couldn’t use a sedan for. But it’s big!

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree.

      They drive a big truck/SUV because driving is the most terrifying and dangerous and deadly thing they do on a regular basis.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It could work! Although, if you’re already getting a $50,000++ SUV it’s going to take a pretty big number to make you rethink your purchase.

      Some other regulation to dissuade companies from selling bigger vehicles would help.

      Maybe do something to raise the price of gas so filling up a 20-40 gallon SUV looks a lot less affordable than an economy car. (Of course that would also fuck the economy silly but so will climate change).

      I kind of miss the small 2000-2400 lb cars of the 90s. My little 2 door Sentra SE-R got 25 mpg city and 35 mpg hwy and always fast passed the emissions dyno test.

      I was comparing the Corolla, 2000 and 2023 model years. While the new one gets slightly better mileage, it is 600 lb heavier. I’m assuming the weight is in part due to the reinforced cabin and doors and a bazillion miles of wiring for all the additional computers and electronics. I wonder what kind of mileage a 2500 lb car would get with a modern drivetrain.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      California already does this through registration fees. My 2010 Wrangler was $280 to renew the past October, my new work truck will probably be close to $900/year.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Our US legislation actually incentivizes large SUVs and trucks because they have weaker emissions requirements.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Are we so confident this change is due to consumer preference rather than manufacturer availability?

    Small cars are less profitable.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Small cars are also regulated away. The bigger the car the easier it is in the US to make it pass emissions standards. Literally the law designed to push for more gas efficient cars results in larger, less gas efficient cars.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Part of the drive I would say is a sort of twisted arms race of personal safety. Not just the big alpha bois wanting to broadcast big dick energy, but timid and mild mannered folks too not wanting to be crushed by a mini monster truck. Not realizing their own tank is threatening the safety of other drivers. That’s the kicker for me, tiny cars arent inwardly dangerous, big vehicles are outwardly dangerous. I dont think it’s something that’s gonna naturally come down. Like many problems in life it’s probably solvable by more public infrastructure so folks can just opt to not drive at all, with no worries of even the most lifted truck overpowering the train you’re riding on.

    • juicebox@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is a big part of it too. I personally know that my mom has said specifically this as the reason for getting an SUV over another sedan. She wanted to feel safer and higher up when driving along other bigger vehicles.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have to admit that being one of very few cars among a see of trucks and subs could get a bit disconcerting. I held out the longest of anyone I knew but it was too frustrating not being able to see anything

  • yenahmik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I prefer smaller cars. Every once in a while I browse what’s available in new cars. Every time there are fewer and fewer options in the compact/sub compact category. I guess I’m just going to hope nothing ever happens to my Civic (which is honestly larger than I’d wish) because I don’t know what I’d replace it with.

    Of course giant vehicles as a share of sales is going to increase, when that’s 75%+ of what is available to buy.

      • yenahmik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, Mini Coopers are quite popular in my neighborhood. They used to be a dream car for me, but now they are just as big as everything else.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are almost no truly small cars available in the U.S. The only recent one I can think of is the Smart, and they’re pieces of shit.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I was going to say the Ford Fiesta but then I saw it was apparently axed in 2019? And took the Mazda 3 with it (same platform). I think you can still get the Honda Fit.

        Uh, as your attorney I advise you to buy a Miata. I guess.