• happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not saying you can’t watch it, just be especially critical of it. If 20% of a 10 minute video is silly time, did they actually do 8 minutes-worth of research on the topic or did they skim a few sources to frame their idea for silly time? Is their audience there for the ideas or silly time? Some creators will pass that bar, most of them won’t because they’ve self-selected for an audience that doesn’t want to listen to a detailed lecture or read the primary sources themselves. When there’s no silly time, a channel like Red Pen where it’s just a static screen and a lecture, they self-select for an audience that knows the material will enough to engage with it directly and critique all of the little details in their commentary on it. There’s no parasocial celebrity factor to it.

    • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are like two exceptions I can think of, but usually when there’s a lot of sugar there’s no medicine, it’s just a sugar pill that you’re told is medicine.