After seeing a megathread praising Mao Zedong, an actual mass killer, and a post about a guy saying “99% of westerners are 100000000000% sure they know what happened in ‘Tiny Man Square’ […] the reasons for this are complex and involve propaganda […],” I am genuinely curious what leads people to this belief system. Even if propaganda is involved when it comes to Tiananmen Square, it doesn’t change the atrocities that were/are committed everywhere else in China.

I am all for letting people believe what they want but I am lost on why one would deliberately praise any authoritarian system this hard.

Can someone please help me understand why this is such a large and prominent community? How have these ideals garnered such a following outside of China?

EDIT: Thank you to everyone who has responded! This thread has been very insightful :)

  • poopsmith@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    What I’ve referred to is the definition of a tankie.

    Oh, I see, you’re the authority on definitions, so whatever you say goes. Even the term “semantic argument” will be bent to mean whatever is convenient for your argument. Can you define “bad faith argument,” lol?

      • poopsmith@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You said…

        Tankies aren’t communists, they’re authoritarians with a red paint job.

        Per the definition:

        Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists

        So you have the ability to look up definitions, just not to read them, apparently.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I know what it says, but “authoritarian communist” is an oxymoron, like “carnivorous vegan”. They may call themselves communists, they may be members of a party that calls itself “communist”, but authoritarianism cannot coexist with a stateless, classless, moneyless society.

          Sloppy editing does not change that fact, and there is extensive literature and commentary providing clarification.