I’m torn between “Every people deserves the right to self-determination” and “Catalunya is richer than Spain, so it’s the bourgeosie wanting to split off from the poors and pay less tax”

  • heartheartbreak [fae/faer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes! Mao argued that it wasn’t just nationalism, but their nationalism was internationalism because a defeat for the Japanese imperialists was a victory for all working people including the Japanese working class.

    • Great_Leader_Is_Dead [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Japanese imperialists was a victory for all working people including the Japanese working class.

      I think the issue is, that’s not always true. Sometimes an imperial victory would be a material benefit for the imperial working class.

      • heartheartbreak [fae/faer]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        While this is the thesis of third worldism/settlers it’s completely untrue unless you think class struggle is completely non-existent in imperialist countries. The strength and position of the monopoly capitalists gives them the power to wage war totally against the lower classes of their own country. Third worldism almost in a sense sees the equation backwards where the reality is that revolution is stifled in the imperialist countries because those countries monopoly capitalists have such intense power they have both the carrot and the stick to prevent the class struggle from being able to escalate. The Russian Revolution was the first successful socialist revolution out of all countries because it was the weakest, most backwards, and internally factionalist imperialist power.

        In this case, Mao was specifically talking about how the Japanese communists were also waging war against the Japanese imperialists class fighting for the working class. There were opportunist and trotskyite figures in the united front against Japanese imperialism that were claiming that they must abandon nationalism in favor of internationalism and sit behind the KMT, while Mao and similar forces were correctly advocating for taking up the national cause and fighting on the Frontline everywhere there was one.

          • LesbianLiberty [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s imprecise enough to be meaningless. US working class is filled with regressive shitasses, but also deeply kind and intelligent folks; same as anywhere on the planet.

            Besides, you didn’t challenge faer point at all; you agreed with fae that an imperialist nation’s working class is done a disservice by living in a country with enough treats that it dissuades them from engaging in class struggle.