• Onno (VK6FLAB)
    link
    English
    391 month ago

    What will it take until people get it through their thick skulls that ChatGPT isn’t intelligent, doesn’t learn and is a tool that can only generate plausible gibberish.

    Using the same tools to detect such gibberish will give you more gibberish.

    Garbage in, Garbage out has been true since the difference engine, it’s just that today the garbage smells like English words, still garbage, but not knowledge, intelligence or anything like it.

    The machine learning approach for building models, used to produce so called large language models like ChatGPT is also used to create weather forecasting models that are bigger, better and orders of magnitude faster than available until now.

    The tools have changed life, but I’m unconvinced that it’s a suitable, sustainable or realistic way to create artificial intelligence, despite claims to the contrary.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 month ago

      People are so insistent that it’s ai that it all reminds me of Blockchain. It’s new! It’ll change everything!

      It’ll change some things. What we are seeing now is business forcing it into everything when really, right now, there are only a handful of things it makes sense to use.

      It’s really great at giving you a starting point a very rough outline of something. That is the easy part. The hard part is turning that into something new and coherent, and for that I think modern AI is nowhere close. That needs a human

      • Value SubtractedOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 month ago

        I think it’s definitely a bubble that will burst eventually.

        At the same time, I don’t think there’s any way to put the toothpaste back in the tube. This technology is out there, and even once the hype has died down, we’re going to be dealing with it forever.

        • Scrubbles
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 month ago

          In the sense that AI is an extremely general term that involves many different technologies, yes. Generative AI/LLMs are not true AGI, which is what people think it is. It cannot think, it cannot learn, it can only predict.

            • Scrubbles
              link
              fedilink
              English
              91 month ago

              That’s actually pretty good… the techbro equivalent of “We did it!”

          • Logi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 month ago

            It cannot think, it cannot learn, it can only predict.

            That’s a distinction without a difference. If it can predict what a AGI would do in a given situation, then it is an AGI.

            I’m not saying that it is an AGI, but the reason it it isn’t is more than “it can only predict”.

    • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 month ago

      Nobody who’s not an engineer seems to give a shit - or, indeed, even understand - the nuance of LLM technology, or the technical reasons behind its limitations and the implications thereof. Hell, I know a lot of engineers who don’t care or understand it at a meaningful level.

      • @stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        And some of the engineering types are busy kissing the feet of people like Altman and Musk so they don’t get a chance to even notice.

    • @Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      Nothing, it seems close enough to most that they actually can’t think about it any other way apart from human.

    • @stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      I manage computing for a large university. One of my recently graduated students told me that he thought that technology just worked until he worked for me and saw the problems that come up. He was already a very tech-aware person and is going for a PhD in Infomatics, so if even he didn’t understand this, then what can we expect from the general public?