silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 8 months agoGlobal warming is coming for your home | Who will pay for the damage?www.economist.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up130arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up128arrow-down1external-linkGlobal warming is coming for your home | Who will pay for the damage?www.economist.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareOnno (VK6FLAB)linkfedilinkarrow-up17·8 months agoIs this retorical? You. You will be paying for it, even though only 57 companies are responsible for 80% of greenhouse emissions since 2016. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/apr/04/just-57-companies-linked-to-80-of-greenhouse-gas-emissions-since-2016
minus-squaresilence7@slrpnk.netOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 months agoYes, it’s rhetorical. Note that those companies are linked because they either extract fossil fuels or generate electricity. Not because they’re the end-users.
Is this retorical? You. You will be paying for it, even though only 57 companies are responsible for 80% of greenhouse emissions since 2016.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/apr/04/just-57-companies-linked-to-80-of-greenhouse-gas-emissions-since-2016
Yes, it’s rhetorical.
Note that those companies are linked because they either extract fossil fuels or generate electricity. Not because they’re the end-users.