Oh, yeah, no it isn’t open data. This type of data is very hard to build in an open data way: people don’t like to contribute privatey data and they will only use such a system if it is big enough…

No, definitively not it. It shows the sphere and even some city names, but just no background map:

It rather is that Mapbox doesn’t trus my browser and gives me a “forbidden”:

Guess firefox isn’t corporate enough for them!

Why does it not load tiles on Firefox nor Librewolf?

My bet: https://www.mapbox.com/traffic-data But where MapBox gets the data? No clue

(Mostly) unrelated to OsmAnd: with https://mapcomplete.org/nature, you can also see firepits and add firepits to the map (and even include a picture). If you add a firepit with this, it’ll appear (eventually) in OsmAnd too

I think OP means a firepit

I disagree. They both serve a different part of the market. OsmAnd is a heavy tool with thousands of features, Organic Maps is a lightweight tool for more general users. Both approaches have (dis)advantages.

No, it is not. OSM is a database of geodata. The rules are clear: what is in there, must be (semi)permanent and observable. A fire staircase meets those requirements.

If you (or a dataconsumer) doesn’t care about this data, they can simply take a copy and delete from that copy what they don’t need.

Don’t map for the renderer. If OsmAnd doesn’t handle it correctly, complain on their issue tracker.

Have a look to https://mapcomplete.org/ as well

sidewalk=no, maxspeed and width should already do a lot

Yes, but actually, no. For a ton of projects, Github is an important resource. It is the main collaboration tool through the issue trackers, offers hosting and continuous integration. If it fell of the earth today, a lot of projects would scramble and have a lot of lost (meta)data.

If they were to announce that they would shut down in three months time, those same projects would scramble as well to migrate - which is also a bit chaotic, but less so.

And: many projects are switching away right now. I moved mapcomplete to a selfhosted forgejo instance since a few months ('cause I don’t trust github no more), Organic Maps moved just now cause they got a (temporary) ban. One of their contributors was apperantly from a US-sanctioned country (more info about them here: https://en.osm.town/@organicmaps@fosstodon.org).

Will this work in Europe?

The proper link: !Panoramax@sopuli.xyz

YUNoHost-server!

The max-boox-pro series had a HDMI-input to have an external eINK-screen and doubled as android laptop. Quite expensive though, and not that useful.

Yeah, the fediverse is amazing. I’ve had cases where I answered a lemmy thread without even realizing it was on lemmy ;)

Imagery sources are tracked here: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index

We track how to load the aerial imagery (thus: the WMS-link), what license it has and where it is applicable. Only aerial imagery where we have permission for is allowed.

Did you see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_OpenStreetMap_offline already?

NOT all ESRI imagery can be used. Their maps are probably copyrighted; and a background satellite view seen in an ESRI-product (which your municipality happens to use) is not necessarily cleared for usage, even though it happens to be shown in an ESRI prodcuct…