She did leave the car running, but it shut off after an hour.

It’s still super negligent to leave a 1 and 2 year old alone in public for 2.5h, regardless of the weather.

Exactly. Even if it was 68F outside, it’s still extreme negligence.

Does she do it for her fuckups, though?

If you don’t have to sit through a bunch of ‘meetings that could have been emails’ on a daily basis, you likely won’t have a use case for it.

But in my last job I was a systems engineer for a web development company. I had to be included on all of the dev calls in case an infrastructure question came up that I needed to answer, and so I was vaguely aware of what the devs were doing.

This software would have been a lifesaver, because my ADHD doesn’t let me listen to stuff like that for a straight hour or two.

As if she didn’t get laid in the psych ward.

People get to feel good about getting someone a gift as well.

Because the sky is brighter than they are.

Source on the last part, please.

It’s still using deception for material gain. Just because it’s harder to scam someone without dementia doesn’t make it not fraud.

Being started by a millennial means nothing to the discussion. Were millennials the users who popularized it?

Not really, no. It’s still using deception for material gain through gift giving. Maybe it’s more of an extreme case, but I was being hyperbolic.

I hope that happens soon.

I don’t think millennials are responsible for 4chan. That shit was a cesspool while most of them were in elementary school.

Your cancer having ass dying is their goal.

Didn’t Trump kill that in his first term anyways?

But it’s not like it matters since a church losing their tax exempt status because of politics has only happened like once in the entirety of US history.

Most politicians are absolutely guilty of fraud.

You don’t have to promise anything in return for it to be fraud. If I start a Go Fund Me because I have cancer when I really don’t have cancer, the people donating aren’t promised anything in return. It’s still fraud.

So, it’s not fraud if I tell my grandma with dementia that it’s my birthday once a week so she keeps giving me birthday checks?

It’s pretty much the textbook definition of fraud. What are you talking about?

Fraud is defined as intentional deception to deprive a victim of a legal right or to gain unlawfully from a victim.

He intentionally deceived 35 people for material gain. It’s even more fraud if he deceived each one about only dating them.

In the US that could also potentially be rape by deception if any of them slept with him because they thought they were exclusive.

But the thing is that this could have easily been a public transit vehicle that crashed. This article really isn’t super appropriate for the sub