You’re obviously not the younger/est child in your family.

That has wasssssssssssuuuuuuuup vibes.

Um.

1. Cops and Robbers
2. Cowboys and Indians
3. Cosplayers who LARP as villains (e.g. Storm Troopers, Vader, Palpatine, etc).

This is not a new thing, it’s just adapted to the digital age.

I’ve lost ~15 lbs myself by cutting out snacking and eating more lean protein like chicken.

Speak for yourself. It’s both for me.

Way to go! That’s no small feat! You should be proud of your progress.

Yes, blame the consumers yet again when we all know corporations are the biggest climate offenders.

You mean every day?

This is why I have over 6k photos and videos still on my phone, even though they’re also on iCloud. But you’ve got the right idea. Once I buy me a NAS, I’m doing the same damn thing!

YTMND

Can I come? 🥺

It could go either way. The benefit of faking an activist mesh network is tracking and surveillance for later retaliation.

To be fair, given what lengths the police will go to messing with protesters, would anybody trust some random mesh network?

My neighbor invited me over to a weekly gathering he had with his buddies. Lots of TPUSA-style conversations. I haven’t been invited back since. No love lost on my part.

That’s how I look at it. You want to pay me to go to a meeting that could’ve been an email? Ok! Bet!

Bravo! 👏

As an aside, I’ve heard an internet rumor that if you spray paint a dong beside a pot hole, the city will come fill it (correctly) much faster.

Get you a clicker or dinger or whatever and do it yourself. Works for dogs. 🤣

Me cleaning my house makes me sweaty, dirty, and tired; not to mention it makes me have to put out my trash more often. Me playing a simulator allows me to be comfortable and not exert myself.

General rule of thumb: if you have to resort to emotional name calling, you’re in the wrong; even if your initial argument is factually correct, the moment you let your emotions take over is the moment you’ve lost your argument.

And no, I am in no way saying this person’s argument is factually correct; especially since his argument is based on hypocrisy.