Is that a thing? Only pieces of shit use the word triggered now…?

See, to me, you outed yourself as a piece of shit by burning things that could have been donated to kids who have nothing.

So I guess we all have our perspectives huh? :) x

Edit: interesting edit to decide to add the word snowflake to your comment… Trying to work out if you’re being a bit thick or deliberately ironic. Either way it’s an odd decision in this context to be honest.

Ahhhh, you have last word syndrome I see :) x

Then you’re totally welcome :) x

Do you realise the first comment in the thread was just a harmless (amusing even) observation and you were triggered for some reason and responded with “hurrr durrr”…?

You seem like a real cunt :) x

I will ask if she wants a drink, then request she makes me one too when she says yes.

I never offered to make it, only asked if she WANTED one.

I will then go make her a drink of course, and I’m not sure she’s ever found it funny, but I’m amused.

You can’t conflate one thing, by definition it requires more than one. That’s enbarrassing.

It’s all about getting the consistency right

I presume they mean his first meeting with Tuco, can’t think of another one that fits the description.

Even in petrol cars automatic transmissions are more common than manual for new cars now. Automatic has just become better and better, and there’s just very little reason to have a manual these days.

100%

What an insane point to make. If you’re a car person then of course you’ll admire others’ cars, even if you’re not, they’re often great bits of design and good fun in the right setting.

It’s only stupid if you then go out and try to get something to compete with it for more than you can afford to spend. I have no idea what the poster you replied to is talking about.

Yes on par is stretching the truth very thinly for sure (today at least), the gap is closing though and eventually I expect phones will be running AAA games too. It will take some more large developments in phones before it’s realistically possible but I can totally see phones being “dockable” becoming the form in future, and I expect mobile gaming will have some big changes if that does happen.

There’s that lack of comprehension I’ve grown to love you for xD

Quoting things I haven’t said seems a bit weird too bud…

You’re very welcome, although not actually an insult, again I’m just making the point as I see it. This one being that you appear to be an actual child.

I consider failure to make a coherent point an actual failure, so thanks for that :) x

You claimed it was lightyears behind to be fair, nobody said it’d be an equal to today’s gaming rigs but the gap has certainly closed a bit.

Current phones are more powerful than a switch already, which is releasing AAA games that people are buying so some people are perfectly happy playing a game with moderate gfx and performance. I can absolutely see AAA games being designed for phones in the future and docking in a similar way.

I think the last time I heard anyone say this sincerely was in school.

Your lack of comprehension is making a little more sense. Thanks mate :) x

Yes that, but one that can be lifted up and taken with you in your pocket:) x

I was curious and looked on the tazo website.

For Tazo Awake English breakfast tea the label says “based on tea brewed with freshly boiled water for 5 minutes (no milk, no sugar), an 8 fl oz cup typically contains insignificant amounts of calories, fats, carbohydrates, sugars, protein and sodium”.

Seems weird for yours to have such a significant difference even if its a slightly different type, could you post an image?

Read my response again mate, the irony of telling me to read better is kinda delicious xD

My guy, you responded to that comment. And you need me to repeat myself? Just read better.

No, I didn’t respond to that comment, I responded to the comment where you confidently and incorrectly stated that PoV wasn’t relevant :) x

I was making my point in the context of the thread mate. I.e. Will PCs dominate gaming in future? If your only point was that computers are more powerful than mobiles why not make that your response to my first comment? I thought this was a discussion about whether PCs will continue to be as relevant in gaming as they are today, and I don’t think they will.

I guess my point isnt that your original point is wrong, it’s more that it’s not particularly relevant in this instance. And the PoV of the user is far more important (as evidenced by all those switch only gamers).

LOL their entire point was that PCs were popular because “everyone has one”.

Who’s entire point was that…? Because I just read every parent comment to this and it’s not mentioned once, the only point I’m making is that I expect the majority of gaming to be done on mobile in the eventual future.

The world’s best phone will be “outstripped” by a basic desktop costing half the price. Always. Simple physics.

This may be true today, but as PCs become only specialist equipment those basic machines will get rarer and rarer. It also doesn’t matter if the smartphone is capable of playing AAA games at a comparable quality.

Slightly amused by the point you make about mobile/switch revenues… How is it that you can argue the PCs win vs switch because they earn more money, then in the next breath ignore the fact that mobile does that against all other gaming combined?

deleted by creator