Good luck! I am pretty busy right now, so don’t think I will be playing any games, but never say never!

@CuriousDynamics@lemmy.world

Feel free to cross post to:

!turnbasedstrategy@piefed.world (almost a thousand subs)

So back when I first played Majesty as a kid, I actually looked up a guide for the some of the end game scenarios. I was able to clear all the “advanced” scenarios and some of the expert scenarios, but I was making seemingly zero progress on several of the expert campaign maps.

This was with knowing the game mechanics and “OP” approaches relatively well. The game does have a more exploratory approach to balance that isn’t immediately clear and is mandatory for harder maps.

The approach to beating some of the expert maps was extremely convoluted. Basically a fully structured build order and a lot of luck on top. I am not sure how the author of the guide even discovered the solutions. For most of the expert campaign maps that was I stuck with, I wasn’t able to find alternative approaches. Even to this day I am curious if there are viable alternative approaches.

I also agree that there is a lot of variety and fun to the scenarios. They are very different and a spin to the core gameplay formula (much more so than many classical RTSs from that period).

It really does flip the script on the standard RTS formula and allows for a completely different play-style than most RTS games.

But to be fair, many of the mid to late game campaign maps do require extensive micromanagement.

It’s still very playable even today. The HD version has support for modern resolutions and modding (the scene is relatively active for a somewhat niche game from 2000).

While I actually do speak Ukrainian (I live Ukraine), this unfortunately hits rule 3 as most people on this community don’t speak Ukrainian.

Sure, but they tend to be low-end mini PCs with older CPUs, very weak iGPUs, a tiny SSD and something along the line of 8 GB RAM.

I really enjoyed the world building in Cloudpunk!

I am assuming Cloudpunk performed above their expectations and they are using this money to try and build out Nivalis. I do agree that fully interactive lifesim open world (with greatly improved graphics, I personally prefer the blocky voxel style of Cloudpunk) is a massive undertaking.

If they pull it off, I will speculate they’ll have runway success.

I loved Cloudpunk and its world. I would often just spend the time exploring different neighbourhoods and checking out the architecture and design (didn’t finish the DLC though because of the mandatory racing parts).

I am really looking forward to Navalis. The lifesim/management game spin on the world of Cloudpunk is perfect!

That’s not the end of the world.

I am a huge supporter of FOSS, whenever possible I use FOSS applications on both desktop and mobile. But indie games is actually one area where it would make sense to have proprietary engine and art (albeit maybe for a period of say 10 years for the engine and a somewhat longer period for art).

By definition, a competitive fee/rate is controlled by the market, not by a single entity that set a rate ~20+ years ago.

This is not matter of punishing anyone, but recognizing reality; massive network effects, immense switching costs and lack of market driven rate setting.

I am honestly a little bit in shock how people are willing to do volunteer PR for Valve.

They are an American technology, they can’t escape the culture of corruption and criminality that dominates their region.

That’s true. I’ve gotten pushback for criticizing Valve and there is a lot to criticize.

They might be better in some way than other US tech companies, but that’s doesn’t mean much.

Not everyone has loyalty to Valve or any company.

Are you sure about that? Here is Cities in Motion (2011) for comparison:

Sure, I am not saying trust him, it’s more like a morbid curiousity thing.

I am not into horse training, but this like a relatively high quality management/sim game.

Correct.

That’s not the same thing as what you are claiming (that I wish bad things for those Americans who oppose the current regime).

I don’t believe this is happening any more in the main sub-reddit community.

It is a mischaracterization! What have I said that makes it seems to you that I support the US oligarchic regime and wish the worst to those Americans that oppose it?

That’s simply not true!

That’s a mischaracterization. Trust me, it brings me no joy to see the US become a chauvinist, criminal oligarch regime. It’s a disaster to be honest.

That being said, you do not want to send money to a regime that wishes you harm and is composed of criminals. Nor is it unreasonable to make an assumption that the dominance of criminal elements is permanent and American civil service will get permanently debased and hollowed out.

Mind you, this sort of outcome is not surprising and a foreigner living in the US could notice the foundations of such an outcome a decade before Trump.