Those were some good specs back in the day… And the price 😯

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it says 98. IE4.0 wasn’t released until 97, same for Pentium MMX.

        • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Heck I think you’re right.

          Man, I bet they were so bummed that they’re stuck on Windows 95 then.

          I was in a similar boat. Got our first family PC with windows 95 like 4 months before 98 released. Which kept me from being a PC gamer until i was later into my teens.

          either way, how common were DVD drives in 98?

          • AtariDump@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not very common at all; you needed a separate MPEG2 card to decode the DVD as the CPU wasn’t fast/strong enough.

          • deranger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            How did windows 95 keep you from gaming? That’s when I started. 98 wasn’t that big of a chance to my memory.

            • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Well it’s not that it “kept” me from it, but I seem to remember the couple of PC gaming friends that I had, had games that I couldn’t run as they seemed to me (with like 30 years of memories obfuscating) to only run on Windows 98?

              But I mean honestly that could’ve been my parents giving me excuses and stuff. Idk.

              I didn’t have access to News and stuff about upcoming PC stuff back then so I could only go off what others told me haha

      • thorbot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yeah I realized that after. But a floppy reader too! Dude definitely reading some floppies

          • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            By 1998? Nah, not really. I think I had at least a 16x by then with my stock prebuilt.

            • frunch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think there may be a difference in measurement and that might where the discrepancy is. According to Wikipedia’s entry on optical drives:

              The 1× speed rating for CD-ROM (150 Kbyte/s) is different from the 1× speed rating for DVDs (1.32 MB/s).

              So if that was indeed a 2x DVD drive, it would be pretty comparable (if I’m interpreting all this info correctly): 16x150,000 bytes per second= 2,400,000 or ~2.4 MB/s and the 2x DVD speed would be 1.32 MB/s x2= ~2.6MB/s

              Pretty close!

      • valkyre09@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I came to the comments hoping somebody would explain a reason for 2 DVD readers back in the days of Win95 lol thanks!