• axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fascists in America seem like they’re an equal threat if a Democrat is in power or not. Other than very local politics, every American politician is on the same team the same way cops are all on the same team. The two sides are theater.

  • GhostSpider [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    No but seriously, when will you Americans stop just saying “don’t vote blue” and start to mobilize to get a third party in play? It’s ought to happen at some point, right? Letting the facists win isn’t exactly the right answer either…

    • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      We would literally have to stage a revolt because there is no way our system would allow a third party to actually be functionally a threat to our current capitalist duopoly of “Blue Team vs Red Team”.

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      We keep telling you we need to vote blue to stop 10% Hitler 25% Hitler 50% Hitler 80% Hitler 99% Hitler 100% Hitler Double Hitler Triple Hitler! It’s vital for our freedom that we only vote for double Hitler this time, you don’t want triple Hitler to win, do you? If you vote for a third party, that’s stealing votes from our guy, double Hitler and giving them straight to triple Hitler! There’s no time to organise a third party, it’s too important!

  • GucciMane [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I need a weimar history buff to help me understand this, wasn’t the United Front only created after the “failure” of Comintern’s social fascism theory, where the KPD opposed both the SPD and Nazis equally? (I put failure in quotes because I’m not sure if it actually failed or not)

    Or is this meme referring to the earlier 1919 revolution, which was backstabbed by libs?

    • Hexbollah [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The social fascism line was because it was the SPD that crushed the 1919 revolution not the libs. Friedrich Ebert and the higher ups in the SPD used the Freikorps to crush the revolution and assassinate Luxemburg and Liebknecht.

      I am guessing that the meme has in mind Hindenburg appointing Hitler as Chancellor and the liberal party voting for giving emergency powers to Hitler, post Reichstag fire.

    • sisatici [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am talking about liberal liberals not succdems. Dems are not even succdems. I remember spd being the first one to take a side against commies with 3 arrows then commies returned aggression. Even then, at least they actually opposed fascism unlike libs