• @ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 hours ago

    killing others indirectly

    Huh. I wonder how you do that. If the wind knocked down a tree and the tree killed someone, would the wind indirectly have killed someone? That’s kind of like the old adage “speed doesn’t kill, it’s the sudden stop”

    • @Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      88 hours ago

      If you’re fucking around with your radio equipment doing something you shouldn’t and end up causing interference on, for example, aircraft frequencies or emergency service radio systems, you could be a contributing factor to an airliner crashing or an ambulance not being dispatched in a timely manner and a patient dying because they didn’t get to the hospital in time.

      You didn’t directly kill anyone, but you set up the circumstances that resulted in someone dying.

      • AlexanderESmith
        link
        fedilink
        -16 hours ago

        Uhhh, no. I can’t speak to the ambulance comms, but a plane isn’t going to fall out of the sky because they can’t hear the radio. Even if they have to fly VFR and make an emergency landing (which would be the worst case). Waaay too many safeguards in place (including the pilot themselves being trained for loss of comms).

        The radio in the plane could melt and you’d still be able to communicate with ATC via light guns.

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 hours ago

      It’s not that hard to use ham radio equipment to screw with things like aviation com/nav radios and the like.